APPENDIX J
Motor Vehicle Industry: Production, Sales, and Employment
MARKET SHARE
[APRIL 1, 1998] Michigan is the
nations leading motor vehicle producer, although its share of the total has declined
significantly in recent years (see Exhibit 1). The high for
Michigans share of total U.S. production since 1960 is roughly 34 percent, which has
occurred three times, most recently in 1982. In 1996, however, Michigans share was
only about 25 percent, down from 28 percent as recently as two years earlier. There are
two reasons for the decline.
In
1996 Michigan had only 18 percent of U.S. truck production but 31
percent of passenger cars, and truck sales have been increasing much
faster than car sales.
Many
of the better selling vehicles, such as the Ford Taurus, Saturn, and
Ford Explorer, are not produced in Michigan.
Not only has Michigan lost market share in the
United States, but the nation has lost share worldwide, reducing Michigans share of world
motor vehicle production. In 1950 the United States produced more than three-quarters
of all vehicles sold worldwide, and Japan produced less than one percent; Michigans
share of world production was about 25 percent. By 1980 Japan had surpassed the U.S. for
the first time (see Exhibit 2), manufacturing about 28 percent of
world production, while the U.S. share was under 21 percent. It took almost 15 years for
the United States to surpass Japan again. In 1996 the U.S. share of worldwide vehicle
production was nearly 30 percent, and Japans was about 20 percent; Michigans
worldwide share was a little under 5 percent, down from just under 7 percent in 1994.
INDUSTRY VOLATILITY
Vehicle sales historically have been volatile, as may be seen in the steep peaks and
valleys shown in Exhibit 3. 1978s national high deteriorated
in only four years to 1982s low, followed in another four years by 1986s
record high, which, five years later, had declined 23 percent, to 1991s low. The
sales trend since 1991 generally has been upward, except for a small dip in 1995. In 1997
a little more than 15 million motor vehicles were sold, up about 23 percent from 1991,
when the current upward swing began.
CARS VERSUS LIGHT TRUCKS
Sales increased consistently in the 1980s; on average about 600,000 more motor vehicles
were sold annually than in the 1970s. Although this increase parallels income and
population growth, the entire increase was in light truck sales. The passenger-car market
contracted, with 360,000 fewer cars sold annually than in the 1970s. The market share
taken by trucks increased from 25 percent in 1979 to almost 34 percent in 1989, and this
trend continues in the 1990s, with sales averaging about 500,000 units higher annually
than in the 1980s. The move from passenger cars to trucks has accelerated in the 1990s.
Passenger-car sales are averaging more than one million units less annually than in the
1980s, and truck sales are averaging almost 2 million units more. Trucks accounted for
about 45 percent of total vehicle sales in 1997. Many of these units, however, were
minivanswhich are classified as light trucksthat replaced station wagons for
family transportation.
IMPORTS AND TRANSPLANTS
A significant development in the motor vehicle industry obviously has been growth in the
foreign presence. Import sales in the United States rose from 15 percent in 1978
to 26 percent in 1986, the peak year for import sales, at more than 4 million units. Since
1986 imports have declined every year, and in 1997 they accounted for 11 percent of U.S.
sales. However, the reduction in imports has been more than offset by the increase of
production in the United States by transplants (foreign-owned plants). Transplant
production has increased from 300,000 units in 1984 to more than 2 million in 1996.
Production by U.S. companies peaked at almost 13
million units in 1978; the drop since then may be attributed in part to market inroads by
imports and transplants. By 1986 U.S. production had dropped to fewer than 11 million
units. By 1996 the U.S. production figure was under 10 million vehicles, and the
import/transplant share of U.S. motor vehicle sales was 28 percent (38 percent of
passenger cars).
EMPLOYMENT
From 1985 to 1991 Michigan motor vehiclerelated manufacturing employment (includes
manufacturers and suppliers) fell more than 17 percent as automakers downsized operations
(see Exhibit 4). In 1991 a modest recovery began, amounting to
about an 11 percent increase by 1995. But 1996 saw a dip of about 2 percent, and it
appears that in 1997 there was another slight dip (final data are not in). Today, about 11
percent of the Michigan work force holds a job related to vehicle manufacturing.
In 1978 motor vehicles accounted for about 55
percent of all Michigan manufacturing employment, but since then the trend has been
downward, and in recent years the share has been 4849 percent. The decline in motor
vehiclerelated manufacturing jobs as a share of total Michigan wage and salary
employment has been even sharper, from nearly 18 percent in 1978 to 11 percent in 1996.
CONSUMER TRENDS
There are several trends and changes in consumer behavior that will affect future car
sales. First, consumers are keeping their vehicles longer. One reason is that improved
quality means that vehicles last longer. Another is that the period for which one may take
an automobile loan has been extended considerably.
For
passenger cars, the average age of a car in 1970 was 5.6 years; in
1996 it was 8.5 years. For light trucks, the 1970 average age was
7.3 years; in 1996 it was 9.4 years.
From
1980 to 1991, the average motor-vehicle loan maturity increased from
45 to 55 months. The 1996 figure was down to 52 months, due largely
to increasing use of leases, which generally are for two or three
years.
Second, leasing has become a common way to obtain
a motor vehicle. In ten years (1986 to 1996) the number of cars leased has grown from less
than 8 to 27 percent, and the number of trucks leased from 2 to 21 percent. Leasing is
most widely used for luxury vehicles: 64 percent of these models currently are obtained
this way. Because leases are relatively short term, one recent consequence has been a
large supply of late-model used cars coming to market after leases have expired; this is
depressing used car prices and negatively affecting new car sales, because buyers are
receiving less than before for trade-ins, and many are opting to buy a used rather than
new car.
Third, the average monthly car payment has gone
up sharply in recent years. From 1980 to 1990 the average payment increased from $184 to
$291 a month (adjusted for inflation, actually a slight decline). But by 1996 the amount
had outstripped inflation, and the average monthly payment was $405 (adjusted for
inflation, an annual average increase of 2.5 percent since 1990). This recent acceleration
in car payments has been partly responsible for the slow sales growth in the last four
years.
Fourth, demographic trends will present a major
challenge for U.S. automakers. A survey reported in Business Week (December 1,
1997) shows that among the major buying groups, the preference for Big Three vehicles is
diminishing by age: Favoring Big Three vehicles are 60 percent of buyers aged 54 and
older, 44 percent of buyers aged 3353 (babyboomers), and only 41 percent of those
aged 1832 (generation X). The over-54 age group currently accounts for one-third of
all vehicle purchases, but by 2010 it will account for only 12 percent, which could mean
real problems for domestic car companies.
There are other warning signs for the industry.
Autofacts Unit of Coopers and Lybrand Consulting projects that over the next five years
worldwide auto-making capacity will rise 13 percent, to nearly 80 million vehicles
annually, from last years 70 million. That will bring excess capacity, based on
projected demand, to more than 20 million units a year in 2002, up from an estimated 18.5
million units in 1997. To put these numbers in perspective, the Big Three together
produced 18.3 million cars and trucks in 1997.
Automakers worldwide could be forced to make
asset write-downs of $15 billion or more over the next few years; Morgan Stanley Dean
Witter, which makes this estimate, attributes it to excess capacity. The president of
Autofacts says the key issue "is that overcapacity is a destabilizing force. Good
companies will do crazy things." Ruinous price wars are one, he says.
Others are less concerned. Merlis Automotive
International, another consulting group, projects that world-wide vehicle production in
2000 will average 81.7 percent of straight-time capacity compared with 82.7 percent in
1995. In the automobile industry, capacity-utilization rates of 8090 percent are
considered healthy.
OUTLOOK
The trends suggest that the long-term outlook for the motor vehicle industry is not
promising. Nationally, motor vehicle sales are expected to grow slowly over the next
decade. This slow-growth trend could be offset partially by an increase in exports. From
1986 to 1996, while U.S. sales at home where falling about 5 percent, U.S. motor vehicle
exports jumped almost 44 percentbut the number exported still was fewer than one
million units (of which about two-thirds go to Canada), and they account for only about 8
percent of U.S. production. An encouraging note may be the eventual potential for
increased exports to such emerging markets as Russia and China.