Arts Funding
BACKGROUND
[APRIL 1, 1998] Some see the arts as encompassing anything produced by
humans; culture, aesthetics, and the humanities are alternative
descriptions. Others use narrower definitions: the fine arts (e.g., symphonic
music, ballet, painting, sculpture, drama) or the popular arts (e.g., motion
pictures and such musical forms as rock and jazz).
Participation
Participation in the arts is significant. In its 1997 American Canvas, the
National Endowment for the Arts (NEA) finds that many more Americans are attending arts
activities than professional sporting events. Beyond attendance, many Americans
participate directly in the arts: 4 percent play classical music, 10 percent paint, 12
percent take photographs, 7 percent write creatively, and 25 percent do needlework. The
report points out, however, that "it cannot be claimed that the arts are in any
meaningful sense integrated into our daily lives in quite the same way that sports are
(which is why no less than 12 of the 25 highest rated television shows of all time were
sporting events)."
Employment
The NEA estimates that the number of artists in the work force has more than doubled since
1970, from 720,000 to 1,671,000. The numbers suggest that about 100,000 people in Michigan
earn a livelihood from the arts.
Spending
Economists James Heilbrun and Charles M. Gray, in The Economics of Art and Culture: An
American Perspective, estimate that in 1990 Americans spent at least $7.3 billion (or
0.133 percent of the entire economy) on nonprofit arts$4.3 billion on admission to
live, performing-arts events and another $3 billion on art museums. Adjusting for
inflation and growth since 1990, these data suggest that the nonprofit arts represent
about $10 billion in spending nationally, of which about $400 million is spent in
Michigan. In comparison, annual television advertising revenue in the nation amounts to
more than $36 billion, and Michiganians will account for about $20 million of ticket sales
for one motion picture, Titanic.
Financial Support
In Michigan, 90 percent of nonprofit arts spending ($360 million) comes from private
support by individuals, foundations, and corporations, and 10 percent ($40 million) from
federal, state, and local government. To give a bit of perspective to public
appropriations to the arts, the NEAs total budget of $98 million is less than the
$120 million required to produce two Hollywood motion pictures of average expense. The
U.S. Congress also provides funding to the National Endowment for the Humanities; for the
past three years, the funding level has been $136 million annually.
State governments support for
the arts can be traced to 1960, when Gov. G. Mennen Williams created the Michigan Cultural
Commission. In 1963 Gov. George Romney created the Michigan Council for the Arts, charged
in a 1966 law with stimulating creative and performing arts, encouraging public interest
in the states cultural heritage, and promoting the freedom of artistic expression.
In 1991 Gov. John Engler replaced this agency with the Michigan Council for Arts and
Cultural Affairs (MCACA), which is housed in the Department of Consumer and Industry
Services and located in Detroit.
From $100,000 appropriated in 1967,
state arts funding has grown to nearly $36 million. In the 199798 budget, $25.7
million was appropriated to the MCACA and $10 million to the Department of Management and
Budget to disburse for cultural capital outlay (building) projects. Michigan ranks first
among all state arts agencies in total appropriations.
DISCUSSION
Some people argue that government should not
provide funding for the arts: They believe that cultural organizations should be supported
by private means, through admission fees, ticket sales, and philanthropy by individuals,
foundations, and corporations. They hold that government should not spend tax money to
benefit only some people in using their leisure time. Others object to spending tax money
on controversial or unpopular artistic projects. The NEA has engendered opposition to its
funding (which, since 1995, has declined from $173 million to $98 million), largely
because it supported several performances and art works deemed by some to be obscene.
Still others believe that artistic creativity and independence suffer when politicians
make decisions about which groups and art works to fund.
Defenders of arts funding argue that
preserving and expanding cultural activities are legitimate functions of government. They
believe that all citizens benefit from numerous and diverse cultural activities, the
vitality of arts attracts new economic development and jobs, and artistic awareness is a
fundamental goal of public education, just as math and reading are.
Particularly controversial in
Michigan is the geographic distribution of state arts funds. Throughout the 1970s, 1980s,
and early 1990s, a majority of state arts spending supported Detroit organizations,
primarily the Detroit Institute of Arts and the Detroit Symphony. The spending reflected
state policy that the financially fragile institutions in the states biggest city
should be assisted and also recognized the size, overall budget, audience numbers, and
international reputation of Detroits arts organizations.
Some legislators from areas other
than Detroit argue that each part of the state should receive arts funds roughly
proportional to its population. A recent study (published December 1997) by the Wayne
State University Center for the Arts and Public Policy finds that per capita distribution
of MCACA funding varies (see exhibit). The Wayne State University
study also finds that
in
all regions of the state there is a wide variety of MCACA grant recipients,
and they provide a broad scope of arts and cultural activities, and
not
surprisingly, arts organizations tend to cluster around population
centers.
FOR
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
Americans for the Arts
1 East 53d Street
New York, NY 10022
(212) 223-2787
(212) 980-4857 FAX
www.artsusa.org
ArtServe Michigan
17515 West Nine Mile Road, Suite 250
Southfield, MI 48075
(248) 557-8288
(248) 557-8581 FAX
www.ArtServeMichigan.org
Center for the Arts and Public
Policy
College of Fine, Performing, and Communications Arts
Wayne State University
5104 Gullen Mall
Detroit, MI 48202
(313) 577-5342
(313) 577-5355 FAX
www.cfpca.wayne.edu
Michigan Council for Arts and
Cultural Affairs
Michigan Department of Consumer and Industry Services
Michigan Plaza Building, 11th Floor
1200 Sixth Street
Detroit, Michigan 48226-2461
(313) 256-3731
(313)256-2700 FAX
www.cis.state.mi.us/arts
National Endowment for the Arts
1100 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W.
Washington, DC 20506-0001
(202) 682-5400
www.arts.endow.gov